Cholera Epidemic of 1849

  • by George Bailey • Published: July 23, 2007

Cholera was a relatively frequent hazard in the 19th century, in large part due to the lack of plumbing and proper sewerage. Cholera ravished St. Louis numerous times, but the most brutal instance was in 1849. The epidemic claimed 4,557 lives (the city's population at the time was 63,000). The city officials of St. Louis had advocated the establishment of more efficient sewer systems before 1849, but not until the epidemic had begun to terrorize the city did concrete plans materialize. Construction on the renovation, that of Biddle Street sewer, was not to begin until March 1850. That same year plans were made to drain Chouteau's Pond but, again, these could not be carried out quickly enough to stabilize the disease. Nevertheless, thanks to these innovations, the subsequent attack in 1866 never reached proportions remotely close to those of the 1849 epidemic. (The rate of death in 1866 was 17 people out of one-thousand, while the rate of death in the previous attack was 72 per one-thousand.) In 1884 the Cholera bacterium was identified. This achievement dispelled previously heeded myths about the true origin and behavior of the disease and methods of containment became more and more efficient.

Recent Contributions to this Article

Amazine site Thanks, webmaster.
Posted by: mortgage savings account on Aug 25, 2008 Unverified

individual savings accountSt highest interest savings account
Posted by: savings account calculator on Aug 22, 2008 Unverified

This is where you best internet savings accounts garb the redemptional your money. Upper crust savings accounts in clarification that atrophy duties predict from settling to mixture and the suspire bemoan applies to paving overlook surplus buyers only.
Posted by: best_savings_accountswecy on Aug 21, 2008 Unverified

The www.bransontravelandvacation.com is cool resource, good job, admin. viagra viagra online pills.
Posted by: viagraZedslielm on Aug 18, 2008 Unverified

Have something to add? 

We encourage collaboration, input, and your thoughts on this text. To keep this content fresh, factual, and resourceful, we will do our best to incorporate your contribution into the text and give you attribution. Please cite any online references you have using the provided source URL field. Facts that have not been checked by our staff will be notated with Unverified in the details.

Your name:

Your email:

Source URL:

Comment: